A Conditional Logic for Iterated Belief Revision

نویسندگان

  • Laura Giordano
  • Valentina Gliozzi
  • Nicola Olivetti
چکیده

In this paper we propose a conditional logic IBC to represent iterated belief revision. We define an iterated belief revision system by strengthening the postulates proposed by Darwiche and Pearl [3]. First, following the line of Darwiche and Pearl, we modify AGM postulates to make belief revision a function of epistemic states rather than of belief sets. Then we propose a set of postulates for iterated revision which, together with the (modified) AGM postulates, entail Darwiche and Pearl’s ones. The conditional logic IBC has a standard semantics in terms of selection function models and provides a natural representation of epistemic states. IBC contains conditional axioms, corresponding to the postulates for iterated revision. We provide a representation result, which establishes a one to one correspondence between iterated belief revision systems and IBC-models. We prove that Gärdenfors’ Triviality Result does not apply to IBC .

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs

We describe a model of iterated belief revision that extends the AGM theory of revision to account for the effect of a revision on the conditional beliefs of an agent. In particular, this model ensures that an agent makes as few changes as possible to the conditional component of its belief set. Adopting the Ramsey test, minimal conditional revision provides acceptance conditions for arbitrary ...

متن کامل

Revision Sequences and Nested Conditionals

The truth conditions for conditional sentences have been well-studied, but few compelling attempts have been made to define means of evaluating iterated or nested conditionals. In particular , most approaches impose very few constraints on the set of conditionals an agent can hold after revision of its belief set. In this paper we describe the method of natural revision that ensures the preserv...

متن کامل

Three Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States

This position paper discusses the difficulty of interpreting iterated belief revision in the scope of the existing literature. Axioms of iterated belief revision are often presented as extensions of the AGM axioms, upon receiving a sequence of inputs. More recent inputs are assumed to have priority over less recent ones. We argue that this view of iterated revision is at odds with the claim, ma...

متن کامل

Belief Change in Branching Time: AGM-consistency and Iterated Revision

We study belief change in the branching-time structures introduced in [4]. First, we identify a property of branching-time frames that is equivalent to AGM-consistency, which is defined as follows. A frame is AGM-consistent if the partial belief revision function associated with an arbitrary state-instant pair and an arbitrary model based on that frame can be extended to a full belief revision ...

متن کامل

Iterated Revision in Default Logic

Default logic is supposed to reason with static and consistent default theory, i.e., it can not deal with inconsistencies arising in the situation that an agent receives a sequence of information represented by default theories. To overcome the problem, revision operators for revising default theories have been investigated by many researchers. But none of them has discussed the postulates whic...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000